ACS and evidence
Coalition Berates American Cancer Society for Withholding Cancer Evidence
The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer notes an American Cancer Society report showing that cancer deaths declined slightly in 2003 and 2004. 1
The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer notes an American Cancer Society report showing that cancer deaths declined slightly in 2003 and 2004. 1
Today, the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer responded to a letter from 26 U.S. senators that called on Susan G. Komen for the Cure to resume its funding of Planned Parenthood.
"Contrary to what 26 overwrought Democratic senators and Big Media would have us believe," said Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, "Planned Parenthood does not do mammograms and doesn't offer breast cancer treatment. Planned Parenthood is fundamentally an abortion business that provides manual breast exams and refers women elsewhere for mammograms, thereby delaying breast cancer diagnosis and treatment."
"Shame on Mayo Clinic for misinforming women about the abortion-breast cancer (ABC) link!" declared Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer. "Women's lives are more important than Mayo's federal funding!"
Mayo's website says, "There's no credible evidence of a link between induced abortion and breast cancer, according to the National Cancer Institute." 1 Mayo's staff gave this response to a Wisconsin woman who asked if there was a relationship between abortion and the disease.
Mayo Clinic's cancer research program receives federal funding and must, therefore, toe Big Brother's party line by denying an ABC link. Malec explained:
The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer condemns the decision of the North Dakota Supreme Court to dismiss the false advertising case of Amy Jo Kjolsrud against the Fargo based Red River Women's Clinic. The clinic distributed a pamphlet claiming that medical research does not support a link between abortion and breast cancer.
The clinic circulated a revised pamphlet after the 1999 case was filed. The pamphlet used an outdated 1996 National Cancer Institute (NCI) fact sheet. The NCI asserted in 1999 that the evidence of a relationship was "inconsistent." Yet, the pamphlet said, "The National Cancer Institute has stated, 'there is no evidence of a direct relation between breast cancer and either induced or spontaneous abortion.'"
The state's highest court alleged that the plaintiff did not have standing to sue. However, state law says, "any person acting for the interests of itself, its members or the general public" may pursue an injunction to stop false advertising.
An article published on Friday in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 1 identifies serious flaws in a recent study on the abortion-breast cancer link by Karin Michels and her colleagues at Harvard. [http://www.jpands.org/vol12no2/brind.pdf]
The work done by Karen Malec was an effort to protect the health and save the lives of women by educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer.
We are volunteers whose work depends entirely on the generosity of good people like you.